Our Environment
Our Climate Strategy
(SASB FB-MP-110a.2)
Climate change and food security are two seemingly competing challenges – feeding a future world of 10 billion people with safe, nutritious, affordable food while also helping farmers and our food system reduce environmental impacts and adapt to a changing climate.
We must act with urgency to limit global warming and combat its most negative effects. As a global, diversified food company, we have a responsibility to leverage our scale and influence to help lead sustainable transformation by example and empower our value chain and peers to collectively move forward.
Through partnerships with governments, academia, industry associations, and others, we are working to innovate and impact one of the most pressing long-term risks facing the agricultural supply chain and dependent industries.
Our Performance
Our GHG emissions are calculated based on the World Resources Institute’s and the World Business Council for Sustainable Development’s The Greenhouse Gas Protocol: A Corporate Accounting and Reporting Standard (Revised Edition) (GHG Protocol), as well as internal criteria defined by JBS.
In 2022, we collaborated with credible third-party experts, including a leading UK-based and CDP-accredited decarbonization service provider, to carry out the first comprehensive analysis of the company’s global GHG emission inventory, inclusive of direct GHG emissions from our own operations (Scope 1), indirect emissions from purchased energy (Scope 2), and indirect emissions from upstream and downstream activities in our value chain (Scope 3).
To strengthen stakeholder confidence in our reported emissions, we have obtained third-party limited assurances for our global scope 1 and scope 2 GHG inventories from 2019 to 2022. In addition, we are currently undergoing limited assurance audits for our 2023 scope 1 and scope 2 GHG inventory and our preliminary 2021 scope 3 inventory and will report updated results once finalized. Moving forward, we will continue to conduct assurances against our GHG inventory and Sustainability Linked Bonds annually.
For further information, please visit our Investor Relations websites. It is important to note that the emissions described herein may differ slightly from those resources based on the specific framework requirements of each Sustainability Linked Bond.
Our Emissions Profile
In 2022, scope 3 emissions accounted for 97% of our total inventory, while scope 1 and scope 2 emissions made up only 2% and 1%, respectively. This presents a significant challenge because these scope 3 emissions are not directly related to JBS’s operations and management. They are the result of thousands of individual farming operations growing the agricultural commodities in our supply chain and millions of consumers cooking, refrigerating, and disposing of JBS products.
SCOPE | JBS GLOBAL6 (MT CO2e) | |||||||
2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | ||||
Scope 11 | 3,959,756 | 3,760,221 | 3,873,082 | 3,762,136 | 3,455,664 | |||
Scope 2 (Location Based)2 | 1,852,769 | 1,696,928 | 1,774,432 | 1,601,134 | 1,545,135 | |||
Scope 2 (Market Based)3 | 1,816,020 | 1,530,864 | 1,724,578 | 1,453,967 | 1,548,742 | |||
Scope 34 | NC | NC | 164,116,140 | 182,343,254 | 151,531,147 | |||
1. Purchased goods and services5 | NC | NC | 145,754,605 | 159,582,433 | 134,773,305 | |||
2. Capital goods | NC | NC | 645,683 | 241,982 | 212,946 | |||
3. Fuel-and-energy-related activities | NC | NC | 823,943 | 890,252 | 860,260 | |||
4. Upstream transportation and distribution | NC | NC | 4,590,693 | 6,176,849 | 6,182,901 | |||
5. Waste generated in operations | NC | NC | 373,592 | 388,607 | 771,405 | |||
6. Business travel | NC | NC | 10,752 | 12,512 | 14,792 | |||
7. Employee commuting | NC | NC | 193,442 | 194,704 | 181,628 | |||
8. Upstream leased assets | NC | NC | 76,230 | 71,272 | 71,272 | |||
9. Downstream transportation and distribution | NC | NC | 4,128,819 | 6,314,659 | 2,294,512 | |||
10. Processing of sold products | NC | NC | 1,479,137 | 1,437,556 | 1,321,401 | |||
11. Use of sold products | NC | NC | 4,492,789 | 4,436,735 | 3,434,561 | |||
12. End-of-life treatment of sold products | NC | NC | 1,517,873 | 2,567,110 | 1,375,408 | |||
13. Downstream leased assets | NC | NC | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||
14. Franchises | NC | NC | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||
15. Investments | NC | NC | 28,583 | 28,583 | 36,756 | |||
Total7 | 5,775,775 | 5,291,086 | 169,713,801 | 187,559,356 | 156,535,553 |
- Includes direct emissions from stationary combustion, mobile combustion, agriculture, waste and effluent, and fugitive and process emissions in JBS-owned facilities.
- Includes indirect emissions from purchased electricity, steam, heat, and cooling. Purchased electricity is calculated using location-based methodology.
- Includes indirect emissions from purchased electricity, steam, heat, and cooling. Purchased electricity is calculated using market-based methodology.
- Includes all other indirect emissions in our value chain, both upstream and downstream from JBS operations.
- Does not include emissions associated with land use change as those calculations are currently being improved.
- As of the date of publishing, this report provides the best and latest public disclosure of our GHG emissions. Information in previous reports cannot be used or compared to. For limited assurance reports, please refer to our website.
- Uses the market-based method for scope 2 emissions. NC = not calculated
Our Approach
Our company culture has always promoted on-the-ground collaboration over off-site enforcement, and we strive to achieve our goal to reduce the intensity of scope 3 emissions through collaborative initiatives that improve both the environmental and financial performance of our supplier partners. We prioritize using a just-transition approach to advancing the sustainability of the global food production system, always remembering that success would not be possible without the people taking action in actual agricultural landscapes.
Farmers provide arguably the most important service to mankind – feeding people every day – and partnering with them to help make their operations more efficient, unlock value and productivity, and produce more with less, will help combat global food insecurity and lower emissions.
Our Ambitions
At that time, many companies, governments and non-governmental organizations made similar public goals in an effort to galvanize action against the most harmful impacts of climate change. While achievement of a goal of this ambitious magnitude was never under the control of any one company, organization or government; we believed this collective movement towards net zero goals was a positive step and an important effort to join.
As part of our ambition, we set a goal to establish voluntary targets with the Science Based Target initiative (SBTi) in line with our Net Zero by 2040 goal. During the two-year process of goal setting, SBTi created new requirements and draft methodologies for agriculture-based companies that fundamentally altered the goal-setting process. As a result, many leading agricultural companies, including JBS, have not proceeded with setting targets through SBTi and are pursuing their environmental goals outside of the SBTi framework. While certifying bodies and standards will necessarily change over time, our climate ambitions are unwavering.
Our ambition to set near-term science-based goals in line with our Net Zero by 2040 ambition has not changed. More importantly, no matter the long-term goal, there are significant on-the-ground actions that must occur today, such as our comprehensive efforts to address the drivers of deforestation in the Amazon, if we are to preserve a resilient global agricultural system that works for farmers, consumers and the planet tomorrow.
JBS will continue to partner with farmers, NGOs, universities, customers, and other stakeholders to identify ways to reduce agricultural emissions, combat global food insecurity, and enhance the sustainability of food systems. Agriculture has an essential role to play in the climate change solution and that companies like JBS can and should help lead collective action.
Climate Resiliency Beyond GHG Emissions
As climate change continues to challenge the agricultural sector, we are committed to expanding our focus beyond reducing emissions. While GHG mitigation remains a critical component of our strategy, we recognize the need for a holistic approach to climate resiliency that includes ensuring reliable access to affordable and nutritious food.
System resilience refers to the capacity of our agricultural operations to absorb, adapt, and recover from climate-related shocks and stresses while maintaining essential functions. Building resilience involves integrating practices that enhance the stability and health of ecosystems, promote sustainable resource management, and secure food supplies.
At JBS, we will focus on the following key areas to enhance climate resilience in our businesses and value chains, prioritizing their sustainability, productivity, and contribution to global food security in the face of climate impacts.
Deforestation
Case Study: Restoring Land Preservation
With teams composed of specialists and a network of accredited consultants, JBS’s Green Offices offer comprehensive technical support to help producers adapt their farms to comply with the company’s environmental and sustainability requirements.
This support is not limited to suppliers that have been newly blocked for falling out of compliance. The company also actively searches its database for opportunities to help reactivate former suppliers. Such was the case for a small cattle producer from Tucumã, Pará, who was blocked for three years and five months due to noncompliance with the JBS Responsible Cattle Purchasing Policy.
Unaware of the steps required and without the resources needed to regularize his land, the producer accepted the free technical support provided by the JBS Green Offices. As a result, he managed to achieve environmental regularization on his farm – restoring 18.4 hectares of permanent preservation area – and resumed supplying to JBS after a 9-month process of analysis and approval by the Rural Environmental Registry (CAR) and the Environmental Regularization Program.
This is one example of the nearly 8,500 farms that our JBS Green Offices helped bring into compliance as of the end of 2023.
Pasture and Rangeland Management
Case Study: Supporting Native Pastures
Working with industry leading agronomists and horticulturists to perfect pastures for livestock, livestock producers in the JBS FA program are recommended to achieve 75% ground coverage of healthy grass on their properties through regenerative practices. This ensures that livestock always have access to grass and supports the growth of native pastures that are vital to preserving farm biodiversity, including species adapted to difficult soils and tough climate conditions.
In addition, producer partners are encouraged to adopt shelter belts for animal welfare and vegetation growth. Shelter belts naturally provide livestock with shade from wind, sun, and rain, and create corridors for native plants and animals to thrive and connect neighboring farms to create improved ecosystems.
Soil Health and Water Management
Case Study: Incorporating Pigs in Crop Production
Incorporating livestock into an arable rotation gives land a worthwhile break from continual crop production, which is known to deplete nutrients and compromise soil health. Within the Pilgrim’s Europe BQP program, pigs are hosted on partner farmers’ fields for two years, during which time they produce manure that enriches the soil, reduces weed burden and disease carry over, increases nutrient retention, and boosts biodiversity. This makes the land more productive for growing crops like cereals or potatoes, improving yields, and removing the need for arable farmers to use synthetic fertilizers.
To showcase the financial and sustainability benefits of integrating free-range pigs into agricultural practices, Pilgrim’s Europe Pork partnered with Intellync to analyze soil health pre and post pig production across nine farms in Southeast England. The study indicated increases in organic matter and soil carbon, reductions in fertilizer use, and yield improvements. However, the benefits were temporary, necessitating the continuous inclusion of pigs in rotations for sustained results and reinforcing the synergy between livestock and arable crop production.
Animal Health and Performance
Case Study: Testing Feed Additives
That is why JBS Friboi is actively supporting searching for scalable feed additives that improve feed efficiency in animal diets – one of the possible ways to decrease methane emissions. In 2021, JBS and the Instituto de Zootecnia (IZ) of the São Paulo State Secretariat of Agriculture and Supply established a partnership to develop studies aimed at reducing GHG emissions in the cattle supply chain. The collaboration focuses on researching feed additives that improve nutrient use efficiency in animal diets, thereby reducing methane emissions and promoting sustainability in meat production.
In addition, the Neutropec Animal Production Institute was launched in São José do Rio Preto in 2022 as a research center of the IZ. With a new structure dedicated to studying the intensification of beef cattle production systems, IZ was able to monitor animals at JBS Brazil’s feedlot in Guaiçara (SP) for approximately six months. JBS’s participation in this research allowed for large-scale testing and financial support.
To date, five types of feed additives have been tested in JBS Brazil feedlots, resulting in both reduced enteric methane and increased feed efficiency. The company will continue its ongoing efforts to research and trial the best available enteric methane reducing technology in its feedlot operations.
Circular Economy Solutions
Case Study: Powering Renewable Transportation with Waste
Conclusion
Building climate resilience within our agricultural systems requires a comprehensive approach that goes beyond reducing GHG emissions. By focusing on pasture and rangeland management practices, soil and water health, animal health and performance, adaptive planning, and food security, we can create a robust and sustainable agricultural system capable of withstanding the impacts of climate change.
Case Studies:
- To secure the facility’s beef supply via dedicated animals on farm
- To agree to a price independent of market fluctuations, guaranteeing economic efficiency and income security for all, beginning with farmer partners
- To ensure that farmers have an avenue and medium- / long-term vision to plan production and investment
- To help their suppliers meet evolving challenges and expectations related to climate, Beef Orléans developed two unique diagnosis tools
- CAP’2ER, an on-farm Life Cycle Assessment that helps cattle breeders understand their action levers and the positive environmental outcomes generated by their farms
- BoviWell, an on-farm animal performance assessment that identifies where farms can further improve